9.18.00
District 3: Plus ça change
By Betsey Culp
Tiny District 3 has all the elements of a novel.
Little cable cars climbing halfway to the stars, Jade Snow Wong walking up
the stairs of a Chinatown tenement, Lillie Hitchcock Coit chasing after
San Francisco’s finest firefighters, Bill Bailey calling for working-class
justice — there’s enough here for a dozen novels, and some of them have
already appeared.
Here’s Frank Norris in 1899, describing
Polk Street, where McTeague had his “Dental Parlors”: “It was one of those
cross streets peculiar to Western cities, situated in the heart of the
residence quarter, but occupied by small tradespeople who lived in the
rooms above their shops. There were corner drug stores with huge jars of
red, yellow, and green liquids in their windows, very brave and gay;
stationers’ stores where illustrated weeklies were tacked upon bulletin
boards; barber shops with cigar stands in their vestibules; sad-looking
plumbers’ offices; cheap restaurants, in whose windows one saw piles of
unopened oysters weighted down by cubes of ice.”
And Margaret Parton’s semi-fictional
reminiscence published in 1945: “On Telegraph Hill… country notes are
surrounded by a conglomeration of old-style Italian apartment houses which
march up the hill in flat-roofed terraces, by shacks like mine, clustering
near the top of the hill, and by snooty apartment houses, some of them
embellished with surrealistic bas-reliefs.”
In 1978 Armistead Maupin took a young
woman named Mary Ann Singleton to an apartment house on Russian Hill: “The
house was on Barbary Lane, a narrow, wooded walkway off Leavenworth
between Union and Filbert. It was a well-weathered, three-story structure
made of brown shingles. It made Mary Ann think of an old bear with bits of
foliage caught in its fur.”
In District 3, saloons in Portsmouth
Plaza once jostled the elbows of government offices as a rough-and-tumble
Anglo city sprang up overnight halfway between the Presidio and Mission
Dolores. Here, in a pre-telegraph, pre-railroad era, observers on top of
Telegraph Hill signaled the arrival of ships bearing news and cargo, which
the isolated urban outpost on the Pacific coast urgently needed. Here, at
the present site of the Transamerica Pyramid, businessmen and politicians
converged on the Montgomery Block to conduct the affairs of the city and
the rest of the world; here in later years, in this same Monkey Block,
artists and writers found companionship and quiet places to work.
Am I babbling? It’s because there’s too
much, all in this one very small area. How does one encapsulate a district
that contains Chinatown, the Embarcadero, the Financial District,
Fishermen’s Wharf, Nob Hill, North Beach, Polk Gulch, Russian Hill, and
Telegraph Hill? More to the point, how do the voters of all these
neighborhoods manage to reach any sort of agreement about the person they
want to represent them?
In fact, there are nearly as many choices
facing the voters of District 3 as there are neighborhoods. Given the low
turnout in recent elections — less than one-fourth of all residents voted
— it’s possible that the two leading candidates will reach the runoff with
slightly more than 2,000 votes each, in a district with a total population
of more than 72,000.
And a motley group of candidates it is,
too. Least well known are attorney/educator Bob Coleman and home
improvement builder Paul Jacobucci. It was Jacobucci, an old North Beacher,
who provided a neighborly comment at the time of Joe Alioto’s death when
he recalled the man he had known for 50 years: “He always had time for a
hello, he always had time for a few words, no matter how busy he was.”
Unusual in San Francisco,
two Republicans are running — beauty pageant organizer and X-ray
technician Rose Chung, and community projects consultant Mike DeNunzio.
Chung repeatedly told SF Weekly writer Peter Byrne that she’s “tough on
crime”; she also supported Earl Rynerson’s Proposition E, which hoped to
replace General Assistance cash stipends with vouchers. DeNunzio, a hard
campaigner who refuses to observe the $75,000 spending cap, is tough on
homelessness. “No human being,” he asserts, in the phrasing that has come
to be identified with homeless sweeps, “should live in the street.”
Because the Telegraph Hill area, which is relatively affluent and
conservative, tends to vote in greater numbers than the rest of the
district, these two rarities can give the others a run for their money, no
matter how much they spend.
Two of the candidates are
Chinese — Chung, and Community College Board member Lawrence Wong. Like
Chung, Wong grew up in the district. He has long been active in Chinese
American affairs and presently serves as executive director of the Chinese
American Citizens Alliance, a civil rights organization with branches all
over the country. The two may split the already low Chinatown vote in an
area where Asian voters constitute only 16 percent of all likely voters,
compared to 74 percent for whites.
There are two members of the
Democratic County Central Committee — Meagan Levitan and Aaron Peskin.
Levitan, who is community affairs director for the California Academy of
Sciences, recently moved to the district. Under Mayor Frank Jordan she
served as — in Herb Caen’s words — the “well-liked liaison” with the
Mission and the Marina, declining a similar position under Our Mayor.
There were apparently no hard feelings, however, for he appointed her to
his advisory Committee 2000. Peskin, the president of an environmental
nonprofit, is a Bay Area native who has lived in North Beach for a number
of years. Nearly every district has its Ammiano endorsee, and Peskin is
the one for District 3. He made a reputation for himself as an opponent of
Ellis Act evictions and led a successful fight to limit chain store
inroads into North Beach. In a district where 71 percent of the residents
are renters (compared to 52 percent citywide), his support of tenant
protections should serve him well. In other words, this bespectacled,
fuzzy-bearded activist has been cast — or cast himself — in the role of
challenger to the status quo.
The status quo is Alicia
Becerril. Like the incumbents in other districts, she’s running on her
record. Appointed supervisor in 1999, she insists on her distance from the
mayor: “I go into a committee meeting with an open mind. I want to hear
all sides, then make a fair decision.” Her open mind led to a decision in
favor of Brown’s favored plans for Pier 45, the Malrite Corporation’s
history-themed “San Francisco at the Wharf,” which many of her potential
constituents oppose.
But underneath the motley
garb — the party affiliations, the ethnic identifications — all eight
candidates bear a family resemblance. They obviously came out of the same
gene pool. Or more likely, the same city streets. Listen to a campaign
blurb about Peskin: “As a neighborhood leader, he has successfully opposed
chain stores, protected parks, preserved historic buildings, and improved
bay water quality safeguards. Aaron will fight as supervisor to protect
the unique character of San Francisco.” And DeNunzio’s: “I can preserve
our neighborhoods and historic buildings. I will work to protect the
rights of all residents, small businesses, and senior citizens.” Sounds
like they’ve been reading the same book, doesn’t it?
The very elements that have
provided raw material for countless novelists — narrow winding streets,
houses clinging to the sides of hills, small neighborhood shops — can also
unite the widely disparate residents of District 3. Last November the
Board of Supervisors approved an ordinance that will make large new
businesses jump through a variety of Planning Commission hoops before they
can set up shop in North Beach. James Lew of the North Beach Neighbors,
who worked with Supervisor Mark Leno to draft the legislation, expressed
the concerns of the residents: “When you get a national chain store in the
neighborhood and they sell a variety of products and do everything, it
drives smaller businesses out of business, resulting in streets filled
with empty storefronts. That’s what ruins the character of the
neighborhood.” He added the horrifying clincher: “The chain stores move
in, and the next thing you know the neighborhood looks just like Yuba
City, Marysville, or Modesto. We would look just like everyone else.”
When the ordinance was
passed, Leno’s legislative assistant Bob Hartnagel noted, “Other
neighborhood groups have been clamoring for this type of legislation for
their neighborhoods as well.” Can it be that once again, just as it did150
years ago, the area near Portsmouth Plaza stands at ground zero for
intense forces that have the power to change an entire city?